Reuters reported quoting a Pakistani source involved in the discussions as saying that preparations were underway and talks were “on track,” suggesting growing momentum after earlier negotiations in Islamabad ended without agreement.
The same source indicated that Trump’s participation—physically or remotely—remains under consideration, particularly if both sides move closer to a deal.
“I have no problem meeting them. If they want to meet, and we have some very capable people, but I have no problem meeting them,” The New York Times quotes Trump as saying on Monday, underlining the US President’s availability for the diplomatic efforts.
Washington is pushing for an agreement that would stabilise global markets and prevent further spikes in oil prices, while firmly insisting that Iran must not retain the capability to develop nuclear weapons.
Tehran, on the other hand, is seeking sanctions relief and aims to preserve its nuclear program, while also leveraging its strategic control over the Strait of Hormuz as a bargaining tool.
An Iranian official said Tehran is “positively reviewing” the possibility of rejoining the talks, though no final decision has been made.
The statement reflects a slight shift from earlier positions, when Iranian authorities had ruled out participation amid escalating tensions.
Markets reacted swiftly to renewed hopes of diplomacy. Oil prices fell in early Asian trading, reversing gains from the previous day when uncertainty over the talks had driven prices higher. Brent Crude slipped modestly, while US crude also declined, reflecting expectations that negotiations could ease supply disruptions.
DIFFERENCES, MISTRUST PERSIST
Despite these developments, tensions remain high. Iran has accused the US of intercepting an Iranian commercial vessel over the weekend, calling the move a violation and demanding the immediate release of the ship and its crew.
Washington has defended the action, claiming the vessel carried materials with potential military use and failed to respond to repeated warnings.
The incident has further strained relations, with Iran warning it would defend its national interests against any escalation.
Meanwhile, diplomatic rhetoric has hardened, with Iranian officials criticising what they describe as coercive tactics and rejecting negotiations conducted under pressure.
The broader conflict, which began in late February, has already resulted in heavy casualties and significant regional instability.
Parallel military operations have disrupted energy supplies and raised fears of a prolonged crisis that could push the global economy toward recession.
Both sides have imposed and lifted blockades at various points, particularly around key oil transit routes, intensifying concerns over energy security.
PAKISTAN URGES RESTRAINT
Pakistan, acting as mediator, has urged restraint and pushed for the removal of blockades to create space for diplomacy.
The ceasefire is expected to expire within days, adding urgency to the negotiations. While US officials maintain that a deal is within reach, they have also warned of further action if talks fail.
Iran has issued its own warnings, signalling potential retaliation against regional infrastructure if conflict resumes.
As preparations continue in Islamabad under heavy security, the coming days are seen as critical.
Whether the talks materialise—and whether Trump ultimately joins them—may determine if a fragile ceasefire evolves into a broader agreement or collapses back into conflict.
– Ends
Tune In
Discover more from InfoVera Online
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.